Discussion2Replies134Views JonnyGar Member since 2009 91 posts BNY Mellon Posted: 5 years agoLast activity: 4 years 5 months ago Closed Service/API call for rule cache sanity checkWe've run into too many problems where it's unclear that a migrated rule has "taken" -- that is, it will be available to the users who expect it.This has happened in v6.2 through v7.1.5. (perhaps this has been addressed in later ML's?)The common suggestion to delete the Extract Marker is not scalable. We really want have a more surgical understanding of this.It seems to me we should have this as rest/service/API to be callable, both externally and within the ruleform.For a given AccessGroup / pxObjClass / pxInsName (rule name) / pyClassName (if applies), report on the following:What rule is returned by rule resolution?What rule is in the rule cache or assembly cache?What generated rule is in the database generatedclasses table?What is in the ClassLoader?Some of these are in SMA, but SMA has them in different areas, and there's not a single-click Restable call to provide this.[I think I've posted this elsehwere, maybe on PDN Forums, I'll look for that] System Administration ×Close popoverFacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail Copy Link Copied! Moderation Team has archived post This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Discussion, please write a new Discussion. Posted: 5 years agoVipinKumar38163630 replied to JonnyGarIt is a neat idea for product enhancement. Anyone troubleshooting Rule resolution issues will also benefit from it. Posted: 4 years agoJonnyGar BNY Mellon replied to JonnyGarAny new thoughts on this? I have not gotten to creating an official enhancement on this.