Hello,

If you've overridden it completely in the implementation layer, you won't be able to call the flow defined in the framework layer. If you have cases where you may want to do one vs the other, you may want to define them differently. For example, you could put one in a framework class and the other in an implementation class that inherits from the framework class. Or if they both need to be in the same class, you may want to circumstance the one in the implementation layer so that it is only called when X is true.

Thanks,

Mike

Hi Mike,

Thank you for response.

Flow name is same in Framework and Implementation layer. but it is in different class

i.e. Org-FW-App-FrClass and Org-App-ImpClass 

Org-App-ImpClass is directly inherit from Org-FW-App-FrClass.

Now, case is created on Implementation Layer ( Org-App-ImpClass ) and I am interested to invoke process flow of Framework Layer ( Org-FW-App-FrClass ).

Will it possible ?

You need to implement DCR - Dynamic Class Referencing in order to achieve this functionality. You can find help documentation  related to DCR very easily in PDN

Hello,

As RamGP suggested, you will need to come up with a way to be in the framework layer class context. If you have an item already defined in the implementation layer and you are calling the flow in its context, you may be out of luck. In that case, it sounds like what you might want to do is apply circumstance logic in the implementation layer so there is still a path back to  the framework layer if it is needed.

Thanks,

Mike

Thank you RamGP,MikeTownsend_GCS for your valuable suggestion. I will try these approaches and confirm.