Close popover
Karthikeyan Ramalingam (KarthikeyanR2740)
Kaiser Permanente
Principal IT Engineer Applications
Kaiser Permanente
KarthikeyanR2740 Member since 2015 14 posts
Kaiser Permanente
Posted: April 28, 2020
Last activity: April 28, 2020

PAL Reading Vs Load Runner

Performance testing team is using Load Runner to measure the performance. The load runner is capturing response time for every screen (click 'NEXT' button on the screen flow). However the response time captured by Load runner varies drastically with the Server Elapsed time captured by Pega PAL. Pega PAL is reporting very low Elapsed time when compared with Load runner

Screen 1> Load Runner (3.1 s), PAL (0.18 s)

Screen 2>Load Runner (1.9 s), PAL (0.45 s)

Screen 3>Load Runner (5.87 s), PAL (2.78 s) and so on

Why there is different in elapsed time between the tools? Is there something Load runner takes into account which PAL doesn't? 


***Edited by Moderator Marissa to update Content Type from Discussion to Question***


Pega Platform 7.2.1 Low-Code App Development Performance Healthcare and Life Sciences
Moderation Team has archived post,
Close popover This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question.