Question10Replies164Views hasej Member since 2014 29 posts PEGA Posted: 4 years agoLast activity: 4 years 7 months ago Closed Solved Rendering pyCaseManager7 Harness is invalid with Refresh conditionWhen I put Refresh Condition for pyPortalContent in pyCaseManager7 harness, rendering Case Manager is improperly. Refresh Condition for pyPortalHeader and pyPortalNav work fine. Does anybody have any ideas? Did anybody face to the same issue? Thanks, Jun User Interface ×Close popoverFacebookTwitterLinkedinEmail Copy Link Copied! Moderation Team has archived post This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question. Posted: 4 years agoChunzhi_Hong PEGA replied to hasejHi Jun,See if it works by setting the refresh condition on the included section in the pyDashboard7 harness as shown below. Posted: 4 years agohasej PEGA replied to Chunzhi_HongIt will be a workaround, but I still need to put Refresh condition on the pyDashboard7, otherwise i will need to put refresh condition on every harness application is using. Thanks, Jun Posted: 4 years agohasej PEGA replied to hasejdoes anybody think this would a production bug, so I should create a ticket for GCS? Posted: 4 years agoSusanLiu_GCS PEGA replied to hasejHi Jun, I followed your steps (Saved pyCaseManager7 Harness to my own ruleset and added a refresh condition for pyPortalContent section) and reproduced the issue on my Pega 7.1.9 system. If I remove the refresh condition, it show as below:Please create a SR for it. Thanks,Susan Posted: 4 years agohasej PEGA replied to SusanLiu_GCSHi Susan, Thank you for checking. I will create a ticket. Posted: 4 years agoLochanaDurgadavijayakumar replied to hasejHi Jun,Please let us know the SR number so that we may track it through this post.Regards,Lochan Posted: 4 years agohasej PEGA replied to LochanaDurgadavijayakumarHi Lochan, SR-A20539 <Rendering pyCaseManager7 Harness is invalid with Refresh conditi> is created. Thanks, Jun Posted: 4 years agoLochanaDurgadavijayakumar replied to hasejHi Jun,Thank you for letting us know! I have updated this post above.Regards,Lochan Posted: 4 years agoChunzhi_Hong PEGA replied to SusanLiu_GCSBy the way, I've confirmed that same issue exists with v7.2. Posted: 4 years agohasej PEGA replied to Chunzhi_HongHi Chunzhi, Thank you for your information.