Question

1
Replies
344
Views
 PHANEENDRA BATTULA (Phaneendra_Reddy)
Infosys Ltd

Infosys Ltd
CA
Phaneendra_Reddy Member since 2016 15 posts
Infosys Ltd
Posted: May 18, 2018
Last activity: May 21, 2018
Posted: 18 May 2018 7:55 EDT
Last activity: 21 May 2018 12:23 EDT
Closed

Repeat grid Layout refresh issue in Dynamic Tab

Hi Everyone,

I have a refresh issue in tabbed layout. In our application we opens a dynamic tab from the Static Home tab. And in turn we open another dynamic tab from the current dynamic tab which contains a repeat grid layout. Lets say

Home Tab - Static (will be available through out application navigation and no issue here.)

Tab2 - Dynamic tab1 (Opened by click action in Home tab)

Tab3 - Dynamic tab2 (Opened by click action in Tab2 in a repeat grid layout).

Now if i make some changes in Tab3 and submits, these changes made in Tab3 should reflect in Tab2. Seems to be its a Refresh issue with 'Tab2' as the changes reflects in tab on manual browser refresh. And we know in clipboard these tabs reflects as different threads.

Thanks

Phaneendra

User Experience
Moderation Team has archived post, This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question.
Posted: 3 years ago
Posted: 21 May 2018 12:23 EDT
Rett Hean (Rett_Hean_GCS)
PEGA
Principal Software Solutions Engineer
Pegasystems Inc.
US

This can be expected. Pega will not be able to auto refresh these dynamic tabs.


There are too many variables involved. (i.e. under what specific conditions should it be refreshed, and these conditions could vary from implementation to implementation)


Unless you're specifically looking for a refresh when active sort of behavior. But I do not believe that is currently supported. It is only an option for static tabs.


Ref: https://pdn.pega.com/support-articles/auto-refresh-work-object-tabs-portal


So might have to look into isolating what you need/want to refresh in its own section, and configure a refresh when condition. That might work. However, I'm not sure if it's going to work across threads easily.