Question 1 Replies 1626 Views × Close popover Jon Garfunkel (JonnyGar) BNY Mellon Vice President, BPM CoE BNY Mellon US View Profile Send Message JonnyGar Member since 2009 91 posts BNY Mellon Posted: April 8, 2015 Last activity: July 17, 2017 Posted: 8 Apr 2015 10:51 EDT Last activity: 17 Jul 2017 15:49 EDT Closed Ruleset version does not include ruleset version A little paradox; I'll explain. By that I mean, the Rule-RuleSet-Version record does not have pyRuleSetVersion property set; instead it uses pyRuleSetVersionID. I suppose there is a good reason for this originally. But the consequence is, when you list the rules with a given pyRuleSetVersion, you'll actually omit the Rule-RuleSet-Version rule. And thus, if you package rules "of a ruleset version" in the Rule-Admin-Product rule -- and exclude non-rule-resolved rules, the version rule is omitted, it must be included separately, manually. This happens through ML5. This is an easy thing to omit without careful oversight. Has it been considered for Rule-Admin-Product to be enhanced to include these? Jon ***Updated by moderator: Marissa to close post*** This post has been archived for educational purposes. Contents and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar question, please write a new post. System Administration Installation and Deployment × Close popover Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Copy Link Copied! Moderation Team has archived post, learn more × Close popover This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question. Posted: 6 years ago Posted: 9 Apr 2015 17:27 EDT × Close popover Ganapathy (GopinathanGanapathy) View Profile Send Message GopinathanGanapathy replied to JonnyGar I would imagine that rule set version should be added automatically, unless there is a reason behind current behavior; i will check this out. I see pyRuleSetVersionID in 7.1.7 as well.