Question

1
Replies
605
Views
Braam Smith (BraamCLSA)
PEGA
Partner Success Tech Lead - APAC
Pegasystems Inc.
AU
BraamCLSA Member since 2012 100 posts
PEGA
Posted: April 3, 2016
Last activity: April 3, 2016
Posted: 3 Apr 2016 12:22 EDT
Last activity: 3 Apr 2016 13:22 EDT
Closed

UnresolvedAssemblyError on resolving Rule-Utility-Function rules

We've been encountering the occasional (4 that we know of) issue with rules either throwing UnresolvedAssemblyError when needing to invoke a custom Rule-Utility-Function; or more recently not throwing the Error but resolving to an older version of the R-U-F (01-02-03) than one more recently introduced (01-02-27).

Full details are in a post I've just made to PRPC Application Development: UnresolvedAssemblyError on resolving Rule-Utility-Function rules

Would be keen to hear about:

  • Any other observations of this issue,
  • Whether those affected attempted to use SMA's Virtual Rule Table Cache Management utility to force reassembly of the rules which call the Functions.
  • Whether there is any acknowledgement of a product issue in this space, official remediation to existing PRPC versions, and commitment towards resolving the root cause.

We have seen the issue on 7.1.7 and 7.1.8.

Moderation Team has archived post, This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question.