Question

1
Replies
188
Views
 Aydin Toprak (topra)
PEGA
Senior System Architect
Pegasystems Inc.
NL
topra Member since 2016 19 posts
PEGA
Posted: September 20, 2019
Last activity: September 20, 2019
Posted: 20 Sep 2019 3:41 EDT
Last activity: 20 Sep 2019 12:23 EDT
Closed

Get Next Work Capability - Design/Performance Considerations

Hi,

We would like to use Get Next Work capability of the platform.

We have seen that the system is working fine with relatively low active users and tasks on the workbasket.

Our initial impression is that If we add new users and some more tasks on the workbasket, the general performance declines significantly.

We haven't created and SR for that (yet) as we may miss some design considerations for such high load scenarios.

Our target architecture will have 500 active users on a workbasket with 5-7k task.

Do you have recommendations for such high load scenarios?

Thank you

***Edited by Moderator Marissa to update platform capability tags****

Pega Platform System Administration
Moderation Team has archived post, This thread is closed to future replies. Content and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar Question, please write a new Question.
Posted: 1 year ago
Posted: 20 Sep 2019 12:23 EDT
Syl schinco (SylSchinco_GCS)
PEGA
Technical Solutions Engineer
Pegasystems Inc.
US

Things to consider:

- Is the report definition that feeds the workbasket designed in a way that performs well:


  1. The report is limited in how many records are being returned.

  2. Filter criteria is indexed.

  3. No properties that are in the report definition are unoptimized for reporting.

Also, look at the acutal areas where performance degradation using performance tools available (Such as gathering PAL data, using the PDC, reviewing the alert logfile) what's slowing it down?  Is it a database call, an action from the user, etc?