Question

15
Replies
5894
Views
JonnyGar Member since 2009 91 posts
BNY Mellon
Posted: March 12, 2015
Last activity: July 17, 2017
Closed

Making optimistic locking safe

Continuing my questions on locking, from a question I'd asked on the PDN article on Pega7 case locking...

Here's the Pega7 design: “Agents and services such as SLAs and bulk actions can update a case that is being worked by an operator. When the user attempts to save work, the update will fail.”

That doesn't sound like a good design. Is there anyway to use optimistic locking wherein a user's lock could take precedence over that of an agent process?

Moreover, this touches upon the question of whether the engine -- via a Websockets-like messenging -- can notify the client of locklost before the user clicks submit?

***Updated by moderator: Marissa to close post***
This post has been archived for educational purposes. Contents and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar question, please write a new post.
Case Management
Moderation Team has archived post
Share this page LinkedIn